Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by @ZaidJilani and the subsequent conversation about the exclusion of Palestinian Americans from speaking at an event, and the skepticism about Kamala Harris's ability to influence the Israel-Palestine conflict, constitute public discourse. The statement addresses a significant public issue related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, representation, and political influence.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but expresses a critical viewpoint on the exclusion of Palestinian voices, which can be seen as a constructive critique. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the exclusion of Palestinian voices, which can foster awareness and compassion for marginalized groups. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the event organizers and political figures without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight an important societal issue, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for inclusivity and representation. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.