Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement is highly charged and uses inflammatory language, which can be seen as promoting division rather than constructive dialogue. It accuses certain individuals of serious crimes without providing evidence and uses derogatory language to describe them. The statement also encourages others to abandon their positions, which could be seen as a call to action, but it does so in a way that is not respectful or empathetic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does harm by using inflammatory and derogatory language, which can escalate tensions and conflict. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it uses derogatory language and makes serious accusations without evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses divisive language and encourages abandonment. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and derogatory language rather than addressing the issues in a respectful manner. [-2]