Jill Stien

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement expresses a strong opinion on U.S. nuclear strategy and its implications, suggesting that the current administration's policies could lead to catastrophic consequences. It calls for public action to change government policies and promote global nuclear disarmament. The tone is urgent and critical, aiming to provoke a response from the audience.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by advocating against nuclear war, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the potential global consequences of nuclear war and calling for disarmament. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of government policies but could be seen as somewhat inflammatory by suggesting that the government is controlled by 'warmongers.' This partially aligns with the principle but could be more balanced.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to advocate for significant societal change, specifically nuclear disarmament, which aligns with using influence for the betterment of society. [+2]