The statement 'Protect Gus Walz at all costs 🙏🏽 #DNCConvention2024' does not constitute public discourse. It is a promotional or supportive statement related to an individual, likely a public figure, and does not substantively engage with public issues, policies, or societal concerns. The inclusion of a hashtag and a link to a website suggests an attempt to rally support or draw attention, but it lacks the depth and engagement required for public discourse.
- Not applicable as the statement does not engage in harmful language or actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- Not applicable as the statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- Not applicable as the statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion in a substantive way.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Not applicable as the statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Not applicable as the statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- Not applicable as the statement does not use influence for societal betterment in a substantive way.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- Not applicable as the statement does not engage in free speech principles or responsible platform use in a substantive way.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.