Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image suggest that the social media platform X is censoring the account @uncommittedmvmt. The tone is urgent and accusatory, implying that the restriction is unjust. This statement touches upon issues of free speech and platform moderation, which are relevant to public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could incite negative reactions against the platform, potentially leading to harmful discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but questions the platform's actions, which could be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment towards the platform. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and does not provide context or reasons for the restriction. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a direct accusation without offering a solution or seeking to understand the platform's perspective. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to highlight a perceived injustice, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by calling out perceived censorship but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it does not provide a balanced view or context.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.