Bret Baier

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 32

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the policies of a public figure, Kamala Harris, and the questioning of those policies by a journalist. The tone is critical and aims to highlight a perceived lack of substantive policy from Kamala Harris.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is critical in nature. It is neutral in this regard.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a critique of a public figure's policies, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is focused on criticism rather than fostering a deeper understanding.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the policies of a public figure. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to question public policies, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]