The statement 'Bad sources don't age well' in response to a tweet about Don Lemon's claim that George Bush could be speaking at the DNC constitutes public discourse. It engages with the credibility of sources in media reporting, which is a public issue related to the integrity of information dissemination.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It critiques the reliability of sources without targeting individuals maliciously. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more critical in nature.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the sources without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing the issue of source reliability. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.