The statement by Dr. Jill Stein constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically criticizing the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Vice President Kamala Harris for their branding campaign amidst serious global and domestic issues.
- The statement uses strong language ('cringe and cluelessness') which could be seen as harmful, but it is aimed at public figures and institutions rather than individuals. This partially adheres to the principle of doing no harm, but the tone is harsh.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes public figures and institutions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a confrontational tone to criticize.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses strong, negative language without offering a constructive path forward.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of the speaker to bring attention to serious issues like human rights and genocide, which can be seen as an attempt to better society.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to voice a critical opinion, which is a responsible use of free speech.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.