Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement expresses strong disapproval of the NC Democratic Party's behavior in response to Palestinian protestors. The tone is accusatory and critical, and it addresses a public issue related to political behavior and international conflict, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('absolutely disgusting') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the accusatory tone could contribute to a hostile environment. It partially respects the privacy and dignity of others but could be more respectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on condemnation without offering a path to understanding or resolution. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad, negative assertion without providing specific, actionable feedback or engaging with the opposing viewpoint in a constructive manner. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given its inflammatory nature and lack of constructive engagement. [-1]