Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses political candidates and their commitment to breaking the two-party system, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived inconsistencies in RFK Jr.'s campaign strategy while promoting another candidate, Dr. Jill Stein, as a more steadfast anti-war option.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of RFK Jr. without personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions, and it uses a sarcastic tone that could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a political candidate who aligns with the speaker's values, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for an anti-war stance. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though the tone could be more respectful and constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.