Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the political platforms and actions of the Democratic Party and former President Trump regarding military policy and national security. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that the Democratic Party is promoting a more aggressive military stance compared to Trump's approach. The statement implies a negative view of the Democratic platform, using terms like 'warmongering' and contrasting it with Trump's perceived inaction.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses charged language like 'warmongering' which can be inflammatory and divisive. This could contribute to further polarization. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly Democratic leaders, by accusing them of warmongering without nuanced discussion. This can be seen as a form of political attack rather than constructive criticism. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on criticizing the opposing party rather than fostering a constructive dialogue about military policy and national security. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly against Democratic leaders, rather than addressing the policies in a balanced manner. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.