In reply to:
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
38d
The statement engages with a public issue related to evolutionary biology and aging, contributing to a broader discussion on human lifespan and societal roles of older individuals. The tone is somewhat harsh and fatalistic, suggesting that older individuals were historically seen as a burden and implying that their death was beneficial for the species' survival.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it could be seen as harmful by suggesting that older individuals are a burden, which could be distressing or offensive to some. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not respect the dignity of older individuals by implying they are a burden. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it takes a harsh view of aging and does not consider the value and contributions of older individuals. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a blunt assertion without inviting further discussion or considering alternative viewpoints. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it could perpetuate negative stereotypes about aging. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.