In reply to:
Jeremy Stamper 🇺🇦 (e/acc)
@jeremymstamper
·
38d
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
38d
The statement engages in a discussion about evolutionary biology and human reproduction, which can be considered a public issue as it pertains to scientific understanding and public knowledge. The tone is informative and aims to provide an explanation to a question posed in a public forum.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is factual and educational in nature. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing an explanation based on evolutionary biology. It does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion, but it does contribute to public knowledge. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question with information. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by sharing scientific information. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.