In reply to:
dmitry chernyak
@dchernyak
·
38d
Peter H. Diamandis, MD
@PeterDiamandis
·
38d
The statement 'Yes, exactly. Evolution by natural selection vs. human intention' is a response in a conversation about evolutionary biology and aging. It engages with a public issue related to scientific understanding and human biology, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm with words and actions. It is a neutral, factual comment. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by contributing to a scientific discussion. It aligns with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It aligns with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. It aligns with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.