The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues and express a preference for a specific candidate while rejecting others. The tone is assertive and critical, aiming to persuade others to support Jill Stein over Kamala Harris or Donald Trump. The statement implies a moral judgment by suggesting that voting for Harris or Trump would result in 'blood on my hands,' which is a strong and provocative claim.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language that could be seen as polarizing. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of others but uses a metaphor ('blood on my hands') that could be interpreted as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes a specific political viewpoint but does not foster understanding or empathy towards those who might support other candidates. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it dismisses other candidates without detailed reasoning. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to influence political opinions, aiming for societal change by supporting a specific candidate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as divisive rather than unifying.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.