Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement 'This is who Jill Stein is and why I support her until the end of time' in the context of the conversation about the Wisconsin Republican Party's legal actions and the fight for reparations for ADOS constitutes public discourse. It engages with public issues, specifically political support and legal interventions, which are relevant to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It expresses support for a political figure without derogatory language or harmful intent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is a declaration of support without further elaboration.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a personal endorsement and does not address disagreements or opposing views.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a political figure, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society if the support is for positive change. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. It expresses a personal opinion without infringing on others' rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.