Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues and promote a specific political candidate. The tone is critical of the concept of choosing a 'lesser evil' in politics, suggesting that it ultimately leads to greater harm. The intent is to persuade voters to support Jill Stein and the Green Party as an alternative to mainstream political options.
- The statement does not directly harm others but criticizes a political strategy, which is a common and acceptable practice in political discourse. It adheres to the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging voters to consider the long-term consequences of their choices. It aligns with the principle of using words to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a political strategy without resorting to personal attacks. It adheres to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to advocate for a political change that the speaker believes will benefit society. It aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss political issues. It adheres to the principle of upholding free speech and using the platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.