Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by RFK Jr. addresses the issue of media coverage and censorship, which are public concerns related to freedom of speech and media bias. The tone is one of complaint and accusation, suggesting that RFK Jr. feels unfairly treated by the media compared to Ross Perot in 1992. The intent appears to be to highlight perceived media bias and censorship against him, while also pointing out an exception in Fox News.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply that other media outlets are engaging in harmful practices by censoring him. This is a neutral adherence to the principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on media practices rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes an accusation without providing a platform for discussion or offering solutions. This is a minor violation of the principle. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by discussing censorship and media bias. However, it could be seen as using the platform to promote a specific narrative without substantial evidence, which is a minor violation of responsible use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.