Reposted by Bret Baier
Brent Baker 🇺🇦 🇮🇱
@BrentHBaker
·
396d
The statement engages in a public discussion about Kamala Harris's political positions, particularly regarding private health insurance. It critiques a media figure's understanding of her stance and questions the consistency of her positions. The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, aiming to clarify Harris's positions and hold her accountable for them.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is focused on a political figure's public record and does not use inflammatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on public records and statements rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying Harris's positions, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of Harris's positions and the media's portrayal of them. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.