Reposted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr
Rachel Campos-Duffy
@RCamposDuffy
·
308d
The statement critiques the FDA's funding structure, suggesting a conflict of interest due to pharmaceutical industry contributions. It calls for an executive order to eliminate this funding source. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived inadequacies in the FDA's response to budget claims.
- The statement aims to highlight a potential conflict of interest, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for unbiased regulatory practices. However, the sarcastic tone may undermine this intent. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the sarcastic tone could be seen as disrespectful to the FDA. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the issue by providing specific figures and a call to action, but the sarcastic tone may detract from empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the FDA but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a public issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.