Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically the political landscape and the behavior of political parties. The tone is confrontational and critical, expressing strong disapproval of the Democratic Party nominee and the party itself, while advocating for an alternative candidate, Jill Stein.
- The statement uses harsh language ('horrible monster,' 'sell-out') which can be considered harmful and inflammatory, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the Democratic Party nominee by using derogatory terms, which can be seen as a form of verbal harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it fosters division and animosity. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against the Democratic Party nominee and the party. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it uses inflammatory language and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.