Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in a public discussion about the credibility and contributions of a public figure, Jill Stein, and the Green Party. It addresses public concerns and debates about political figures and their roles, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of George Takei's opinion, which might indirectly contribute to a polarized environment. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It remains focused on the topic rather than personal attacks. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on discrediting George Takei's opinion without fostering a constructive dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by providing an alternative perspective but also dismisses George Takei's opinion without engaging in a meaningful dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint responsibly. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.