The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically a political action related to a lawsuit involving the Wisconsin Greens and the Wisconsin Democrats. The tone is urgent and calls for immediate action, indicating a high level of engagement with the issue.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the implied threat of 'suffer political consequences' could be seen as coercive, which might indirectly cause harm. Minor violation.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. Adheres well.
[+2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on mobilizing action through a threat. Significant violation.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a threatening tone rather than fostering a constructive conversation. Significant violation.
[-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to mobilize action, but the method (threatening political consequences) is questionable in terms of betterment of society. Minor violation.
[-1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly in terms of mobilizing political action, but the threatening tone could be seen as lacking integrity. Minor violation.
[-1]