Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically a lawsuit involving the Wisconsin Green Party and the Wisconsin Democrats. The statement calls for action and addresses political consequences, which are matters of public concern.
- The statement does not explicitly promote harm, but the phrase 'suffer political consequences' could be interpreted as a threat, which may indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the aggressive tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a confrontational approach. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a threatening tone rather than fostering a respectful exchange of ideas. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to mobilize action, but the approach is aggressive and could be seen as divisive rather than for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its threatening tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.