Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and image constitute public discourse as they address a significant and contentious geopolitical issue involving the delivery of weapons and the use of the term 'genocide.' The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a strong disapproval of the actions described.
- The statement could be seen as harmful due to the use of the term 'genocide,' which is a highly charged and serious accusation. This could inflame tensions and contribute to harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of those involved, as it makes a severe accusation without providing context or evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a provocative term that may polarize opinions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without inviting discussion or providing a nuanced perspective. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight a significant issue, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to the betterment of society due to its inflammatory nature. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.