Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue involving the safety of a former president and the investigation by a House task force. The tone is factual and informative, aiming to provide an update on the investigation.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual report on an investigation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement is neutral and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the facts of the investigation. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By informing the public about the investigation, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society, contributing to public awareness and safety. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.