In reply to:
SaltyGoat
@SaltyGoat17
·
83d
The statement and image constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue related to corporate values and consumer behavior. The statement by @SaltyGoat17 expresses a strong reaction to the purported comment by Lowe's CEO, suggesting a boycott of Lowe's. The reply by @robbystarbuck indicates agreement with this sentiment.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but promotes a divisive stance, which could contribute to societal polarization. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the CEO, as it uses a potentially inflammatory quote without context. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it encourages a boycott based on political values. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a call to action against a company. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a boycott, which can be seen as a form of activism, but it does not necessarily aim for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it spreads a potentially divisive message without context. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.