Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the topic of electoral politics and the role of third-party candidates in U.S. presidential elections. The tone is assertive and aims to correct a perceived misunderstanding about the electoral process and the impact of third-party candidates.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on factual information about the electoral college and expressing a personal voting preference without attacking others. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying how the electoral college works and expressing a personal opinion on the candidate's impact. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a disagreement without resorting to personal attacks, although it could be more empathetic in its tone.