Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by discussing the merits of voting for different political candidates and their policy positions. The tone is critical and comparative, aiming to persuade voters by contrasting the candidates' stances on various issues.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as divisive by framing one candidate as a 'protest vote' and another as a 'POWER vote.'Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of the candidates but could be seen as disrespectful by implying that Kamala Harris stands for nothing. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the candidates' policy positions but does so in a way that may lack empathy towards Harris.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.