Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement criticizes the justifications given by Macron's allies, particularly François Bayrou, for their political moves, labeling them as undemocratic. The tone is critical and suggests disbelief at the arguments presented. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political actions and their implications for democracy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight perceived undemocratic actions, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for democratic principles. However, the strong language used ('most undemocratic stuff I've ever read') could be seen as inflammatory.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on public figures and their political actions rather than personal attacks. However, the use of strong language could be seen as bordering on disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to political actions and their implications for democracy. However, it could do more to foster empathy and compassion by using less inflammatory language.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the actions and justifications of Macron's allies. However, the strong language used could be seen as a personal attack rather than a purely objective critique. [-1]