The statement by Liz Rathburn constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the ongoing conflict in Gaza, and expresses a political stance in response to it.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language ('genocide') which could be seen as inflammatory. This could potentially harm public discourse by escalating tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'genocide' is a strong accusation that could be seen as disrespectful to some parties involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a strong, accusatory stance which may polarize rather than unite. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It expresses a firm political stance without inviting discussion or considering opposing viewpoints. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the use of charged language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.