Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by presidential candidate @DrJillStein addresses a public issue, specifically the tactics used by political parties to influence voting behavior. It critiques the Democratic Party's approach and advocates for voter autonomy, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language ('complete BS') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes the idea of voter autonomy and the need for political parties to earn votes, which can be seen as promoting understanding and empowerment, though the tone is confrontational. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the Democratic Party's tactics but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments against specific individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the candidate's influence to advocate for voter autonomy and challenge political tactics, aiming for the betterment of democratic processes. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to address a significant public issue, though the tone could be more responsible and less inflammatory. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.