Lex Fridman

The statement by @karpathy and the reply to it do not constitute public discourse. The conversation is focused on a specific idea related to microtransactions and their potential economic impact, but it does not engage substantively with broader public issues, policies, or societal concerns. The tone is conversational and speculative, aimed at discussing a potential technological improvement rather than contributing to civic dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   Not applicable as the statement does not engage in harmful language or actions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   Not applicable as the statement does not involve privacy issues, cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   Not applicable as the statement does not specifically promote understanding, empathy, or compassion.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   Not applicable as the statement does not involve disagreement or personal attacks.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   Not applicable as the statement does not involve acknowledging or correcting mistakes.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   Not applicable as the statement does not use influence for societal betterment in a public discourse context.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   Not applicable as the statement does not engage with free speech principles or platform responsibility.