Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement by Dr. Jill Stein addresses a highly sensitive and contentious public issue, specifically the situation in Gaza and the role of the U.S. government. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived atrocities and call for action from President Biden. The content is emotionally charged and makes serious allegations of genocide and systematic torture and murder.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, but it aims to draw attention to what the author perceives as a grave injustice. This is a complex area where the intent to prevent harm (by stopping alleged atrocities) conflicts with the potential harm caused by inflammatory language. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make serious accusations against specific entities, which could be seen as disrespectful.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote empathy and compassion for the victims in Gaza, but the accusatory tone may hinder constructive dialogue. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but does place significant blame on President Biden, which could be seen as a form of indirect personal attack. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the author's influence to call for action and raise awareness about a serious issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to address a significant public issue, but the responsibility and integrity of the language used can be questioned. [+1]