Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and the accompanying image engage in public discourse by discussing the merits of voting for different political candidates and their policy positions. The tone is assertive and promotional of Jill Stein and the Green Party, while critical of Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The intent is to persuade voters to support Jill Stein by framing her candidacy as a positive choice compared to the other candidates.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does use a dismissive tone towards Kamala Harris, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of the individuals mentioned but does not fully respect their dignity by implying that Kamala Harris stands for nothing. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the Green Party's platform but does so at the expense of other candidates, which may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of Kamala Harris and Trump but does not engage in personal attacks. However, it does not foster constructive dialogue with those who disagree. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to promote the Green Party's vision, which can be seen as an attempt to better society according to the speaker's values. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles but could be more responsible and balanced in its critique of other candidates.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.