The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political endorsements and the perceived alignment of political parties with corporate and imperialist agendas. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived hypocrisy and continuity in political agendas across party lines.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language ('endless wars for global domination have killed millions') that could be seen as inflammatory and harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of cyberbullying by labeling people as supporters of 'endless wars' and 'corporate imperialist agenda.'Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against those who endorse Kamala Harris. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to criticize and potentially polarize rather than for the betterment of society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given its accusatory and divisive nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.