The statement is a critical response to the Supreme Court's decision to block President Biden's student loan repayment plan. It expresses strong disapproval of the decision and attributes negative motives to Republicans and the Supreme Court. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to mobilize support for the cause of student debt cancellation.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses strong language like 'contempt for the people' and 'co-conspirators,' which can be seen as inflammatory and divisive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly the Supreme Court and Republicans, by labeling them as 'co-conspirators' and attributing negative motives without evidence. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does promote understanding and empathy for borrowers struggling with student debt, but it does so in a way that vilifies others. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for a cause (student debt cancellation), which can be seen as an attempt to use influence for societal betterment. However, the approach is divisive. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.