The statement involves a discussion about the presence or absence of policy information on a political figure's website, which is a substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue. The tone is somewhat confrontational, with Roberts emphasizing the importance of policy pages and the Dem strategist questioning that importance.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the confrontational tone could be seen as unproductive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on a critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement involves a disagreement but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and engages in a public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.