Bret Baier

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement is a news alert about a potentially dangerous situation involving a Venezuelan gang entering the US, which could be considered public discourse as it addresses public safety and immigration issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by inciting fear or panic among the public. It uses strong language ('MS-13 on steroids') that may exaggerate the threat. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals, as it generalizes a group of people (Venezuelans) and associates them with criminal activity, which could lead to stigmatization. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it may contribute to fear and division. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It presents a one-sided view without offering a platform for discussion or alternative perspectives. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight a potential threat, but it does so in a way that may not contribute to the betterment of society by fostering fear rather than informed discussion. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as the language used could be seen as sensationalist and fear-mongering. [-1]