Matt Wallace
@MattWallace888
·
217d
The statement engages with a public issue by addressing political discourse and the behavior of supporters of a public figure, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, and the intent appears to be to challenge the integrity and tactics of a political group.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses confrontational language ('Why lie?') and dismisses the opposing side's arguments as 'bullshit fear-mongering,' which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it implicitly accuses a group of lying and fear-mongering, which could be interpreted as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive rather than seeking to understand the opposing viewpoint. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses personal attacks ('Why lie?') and dismissive language ('bullshit fear-mongering') rather than engaging in a reasoned debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; while it is within the bounds of free speech, the confrontational and dismissive tone does not contribute to a constructive public discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.