Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques Kamala Harris's stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict, specifically her response to a question about U.S. policy towards Israel. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that Harris's position aligns with a pro-Israel bias and uses specific rhetorical strategies to downplay Palestinian suffering. The statement engages with a significant public issue, namely U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses charged language like 'Zionist bingo' and accuses Harris of lying, which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly Kamala Harris, by accusing her of lying and using dismissive language. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and divisive. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it spreads accusations without substantiating them. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.