Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. addresses a public issue, specifically the potential future actions and governance of a former President if re-elected. It involves substantive engagement with public concerns about leadership and governance, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a report of a conversation and an opinion about future governance, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the actions and capabilities of a public figure in a political context, which is a valid form of critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public debate about a significant political issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.