Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the Democratic National Committee (DNC) for perceived inconsistency in their inclusivity policies, juxtaposing the acceptance of a Republican in the cabinet with the exclusion of a Palestinian elected Democrat on stage. The tone is sarcastic and critical, aiming to highlight a perceived double standard.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses sarcasm to make a point, which could be seen as provocative. It does not explicitly violate this principle but treads a fine line.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques an organization rather than individuals, thus respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses sarcasm to highlight a perceived inconsistency, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on organizational policies.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise a public issue. However, the sarcastic tone may undermine the responsibility and integrity expected in public discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.