Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement by Aaron Bushnell, 'This is what our ruling class has decided will be normal,' in response to a graphic description of a bombing's aftermath, constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue, specifically the consequences of political and military decisions, and implies a critique of those in power.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as inflammatory or insensitive given the context. It does not explicitly strive to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not show respect for the dignity of the victims by using their suffering to make a political point. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is accusatory and lacks a constructive or empathetic tone. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a sweeping generalization about the 'ruling class' without offering a specific critique or solution. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to criticize those in power, which can be seen as an attempt to hold them accountable. However, it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given the context and tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.