The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a public health issue and involves elected representatives urging a regulatory body to take action on a matter that affects public safety. The tone is informative and the intent is to raise awareness about the potential health risks associated with certain hair relaxers and to advocate for regulatory action.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for the ban of harmful chemicals linked to cancer, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on a public health issue without engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the health risks associated with certain hair relaxers and advocating for regulatory action to protect public health. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pressing the FDA to finalize a proposed rule, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of elected representatives to advocate for the betterment of society by addressing a public health concern. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise awareness about a public health issue and advocate for regulatory action. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.