Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically the legislative process and advocacy for reparations bills in California. It implies criticism of the Assembly's actions and mentions a public figure, Kamala Harris, suggesting a broader impact. The tone is critical and urgent, aiming to mobilize support for the bills.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('killing the bills') which could be seen as inflammatory. However, it does not cross into harmful rhetoric.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the importance of the bills and their potential impact.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, though it does imply criticism of the Assembly's motives.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by supporting reparations bills.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to address a public issue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.