In reply to:
The statement '@TulsiGabbard' is a reply to a conversation about a political debate moment involving Tulsi Gabbard and Kamala Harris. The original conversation by @RobertKennedyJr discusses the importance of transparency and truth in politics, which are public issues. Therefore, the reply constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue.
- The statement does not contain harmful language or actions, so it adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, so it adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society, but it also does not misuse influence.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.