Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a defense of Dr. Jill Stein, a public figure, and criticizes the leaders of the two major political parties. It engages in public discourse by addressing political issues and the characterization of a political figure.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but rather aims to correct what the author perceives as a mischaracterization of Dr. Jill Stein. It does, however, use strong language ('predatory') to describe leaders of the two ruling parties, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on political critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding and empathy for Dr. Jill Stein by highlighting her credentials and sacrifices. However, it does not extend the same empathy to the leaders of the two ruling parties.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the two-party system and its leaders but does not engage in constructive dialogue or offer specific critiques. It uses a strong term ('predatory') which could be seen as an ad hominem attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to defend a public figure and critique political leaders. It does so with a degree of responsibility but could be more balanced in its critique. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.