Jill Stien

The statement 'SJP also right about AOC' refers to a complex conversation involving multiple parties discussing the Iron Dome, antisemitism, and political stances. The tone is contentious and involves significant public issues such as military funding, antisemitism, and political integrity.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a contentious debate that could potentially escalate tensions.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it is part of a conversation that includes accusations and strong language.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and divisive. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a personal attack and does not foster productive discussion. [-2]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement engages in free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it contributes to a divisive and accusatory dialogue. [-1]