Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political figures, parties, and policies. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived hypocrisy and corruption within the Democratic Party and to promote an alternative political figure, Jill Stein.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language like 'genocide' and 'predatory,' which can be inflammatory and harmful. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly AOC and the DNC, by using harsh and potentially defamatory language. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism and division. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against AOC and the DNC. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote a specific political agenda, but it does so in a divisive manner rather than for the betterment of society. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given the inflammatory language. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.